[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: US Patent 6,687,897
If the open source marketplace and RF-specifications are driving the value of software to zero as has been claimed, other parts of the marketplace will respond with means to keep or hold value, in this case, licensing. The economic game is played for the long term, and that means spreading one's bets out across multiple events and players. This behavior is predictable. You are right that this isn't an America vs. everyone else game. It is a marketplace game and many here are involved in creating the forces that drive it. Be sharp about that. len From: Elliotte Rusty Harold [mailto:elharo@m...] Please don't paint this as a U.S. vs. the world issue. It isn't. There are many, many programmers here in the U.S. who are just as [expletive deleted] off about this as you are. There are also companies and programmers outside the U.S. who play this game as well, though for historical reasons the biggest players are still in the U.S. This would be a non-issue in much of the world were it not for the compliance of local governments.* The real conflict here is between corporations and individuals. (Even that is vastly too simplistic, but it's a first stab at defining the problem.) IBM, Apple, Microsoft, Intergraph, Intel, Fujitsu, etc. can afford to play this game. We poor open source developers can't. If this were really a conflict between countries (as opposed to between classes) then it would be simple enough for Australia, China, etc. to simply not provide any legal patent protection. If that's too radical a notion, then they could easily place more stringent requirements on originality before a patent was granted. The failure to do this should be seen as a failure of the local government, not a failure of the United States. We're responsible for our own broken patent office, and indeed it's hurting us badly. However we are not responsible for Australia's broken patent office, or Japan's, or anyone else's. Non-U.S. patent systems are broken for the same reason the patent system in the U.S. is broken: the broken patent system does server some local interests to the detriment of other local interests. Personally, my interests are served by a much weaker patent system, and I would cheer any country that chose to move in that direction. However, I do recognize that this a conflict of interest between different classes, and the class that is well-served by the current patent system is hardly unique to the United States, any more than the class to which I belong.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|