[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: Genx c14n?

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Genx c14n?
• From: David Tolpin <dvd@d...>
• Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 00:15:27 +0400 (AMT)
• In-reply-to: <5.0.2.1.0.20040126200138.02788c88@m...>

> [Tim Bray]
>  >Would anyone like to take this opportunity to shout "Yes, the world needs 
> this!"
>  >or "No, the denominator of the cost/benefit ratio is zero!".
> 
> Yes, the world needs this!
> 

I've realized that just saying "yes" is easy. In my opinion, the world
need this more than

  - pretty printing
  - collapsing empty tags
  - ability to output doctype or xml declaration
  - ability to use multiple encodings

The world needs 
  
  - the commented form of Canonical XML

That is, I would welcome an early version of genx which just outputs canonical XML
with comments. 

David Tolpin

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: Genx c14n?
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Re: Genx c14n?
    • From: Toni Uusitalo <toni.uusitalo@p...>
  • Re: Re: Genx c14n?
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• References:
  • Re: Genx c14n?
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Genx c14n?
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Genx c14n?
• Previous by thread: Re: Genx c14n?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Genx c14n?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread