[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint

  • To: "Benjamin Franz" <snowhare@n...>,<xml-dev@l...>
  • Subject: RE: The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint
  • From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@m...>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:52:52 -0800
  • Thread-index: AcPEMxHILY52J/auRo6HGhh2hFd5VQAAw0Zg
  • Thread-topic: The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint

cognitive style index
> > In any case, I do not deny that language as a tool can impact
thought
> > proficiency, but as I said I believe that this case has been
*vastly*
> > overstated.  It is by no means the high-order bit.
> 
> Roman numerals. Arabic numerals. Mathematics.

The fact that mathematics can be performed optionally using roman or
Arabic numerals proves my point (a Sapir-Whorf style "proof" would
strive to show that one system makes certain thoughts impossible).  And
my computer calculates faster and more accurately using strings of bit
patterns; no Roman numerals or Arabic numerals at all.  Maybe you are
missing my point -- linguistic determinism says that thought is enabled
and structured by language; I am arguing that the *opposite* is true in
the vast majority of cases that matter.  Language is simply a tool that
humans create to assist us in our communications and cognition, and like
any tool, words are subordinate to their master.  When Michael Jackson
says "bad", he means "good"; but when you say "bad" he is still smart
enough to understand what you mean.  When you learned math, you did not
stop understanding how to engage in dialogue.  Some people have
specialized jargon, while others have to string together the limited
concepts that they have to describe the same thing.  And even small
children will happily invent symbols for things which they have no
satisfying extant symbol.  The fact that we create computer languages
(seemingly every year) geared at specialized processing tasks should put
to rest linguistic determinism.  One can be convinced that the human
mind has certain "built-in" cognitive limits, but as of yet our
languages are not even close to approaching those parameters.  Our world
of communicable symbols will *always* be a very poor substitute for
what's in the head, IMO.

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.