[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: When Empty is Everything
For your case or all applications of XML? Because attributes can't have structure and attributes are all one has in an empty tag for adding content beyond the tag name. Some texts do have structure. There are other reasons but that one is the show stopper. I may have missed your point. Examples of your scheme for tagging these texts would be helpful. len From: Dean Snyder [mailto:dean.snyder@j...] I just joined this list so pardon me if this topic has been dealt with before, but it is something I have been pondering for some time and about which I would like expert feedback. I work with ancient texts in multiple languages, including cuneiform tablets, inscriptions, parchment and papyri manuscripts. Converting these texts to XML form presents messy problems because they exhibit rampantly overlapping hierarchies: * single graphemes split across line boundaries; * character effacements occurring randomly in the texts, across lines, cases, columns, and facets; * discontiguous parsing information; An on and on. My question is why not just use empty tags for everything? And if that works why have non-empty tags at all? (I'm aware of the argument for XML parsing simplicity.) One of my main concerns is data archivability and recoverability, even data fragment recoverability. For these reasons I want metadata that is human readable, inline, and practically self-documenting.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|