[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: RDF syntax
vdv@d... (Eric van der Vlist) writes: >But each RDF application can choose to be also a XML application and >define which variations are accepted through documentation and >eventually schemas as we've done for RSS 1.0. If I trusted the RDF community to be as conscientious about this as the RSS 1.0 group was, I'd be far less paranoid about it. >In that case, the number of variations are just more possibilities for >the designers of the application which I think is an advantage rather >than an issue. Unfortunately, there are too many people out there who take RDF's syntax liberalism as permission for them to do whatever rather than as an opportunity for them to customize the syntax so it makes sense in XML terms. I don't find Bill Kearney's exuberant use of RDF structures to be unusual or anomalous. Given his priorities, it makes sense. It just doesn't mesh well with XML practice. RDF serialization, just sort of happens, you know?
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|