[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Beyond Ontologies

• To: "'Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)'" <clbullar@i...>
• Subject: RE: Beyond Ontologies
• From: "Didier PH Martin" <martind@n...>
• Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:50:37 -0400
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE03F9ED82@h...>

Hi Len,

Len said:

But I'm not interested in classifying every living being past and present. I
am interested in instances of the models that can be used in simulations to 
make rough predictions.  So I would feed HumanML data to RPG models and 
watch them.  Beware the local minima problem of annealing systems.  HTML 
is a good example of that.

Didier replies:
I probably have the wrong model but, in my mind, a role playing games are
involving humans playing roles, the machine is there only as a kind of
scorecard. Most of the system's state modification is based on the behavior
of the people. Is that what you have in mind? A kind of "matrix" where
humans helps to resolve some problems? To resolve two proposition about the
same resource from two different agents (i.e. a document classified by a
search engine and containing an RDF description) how do I use an RPG to
solve that problem? Would that matrix interested to solve my problem? Can
you help me understand your ontology and why you reach such conclusion, I am
lost, I do not know why you came to that conclusion.

Cheers
Didier PH Martin

• References:
  • RE: Beyond Ontologies
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Beyond Ontologies
• Next by Date: Adaptive Object models and XML
• Previous by thread: RE: Beyond Ontologies
• Next by thread: RE: Beyond Ontologies
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread