[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Alternative "character entity" proposal
>But surely before we can consider syntaxes for defining entities you >need to get XML Core Group to reconsider making an non-dtd defined >entity ref a validity rather than WF error. If é is a fatal >error, no proposed definition mechanism will work.. That's why the XML version number would have to be changed, say to 2.0. Making undefined entities a validity error in order to allow experimentation would reduce interoperability. I don't really see any advantage to it over just doing those experiments with non-conforming processors. You don't need the XML Core Group's permission to do that :-) -- Richard
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|