[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: the yin/yang web, was: Re: xml schema and
jonathan.robie@d... (Jonathan Robie) writes: >>I read it as somewhat poor; illegal XML examples, uses the wrong RDF >>namespace URI, fails to cite the key references of the time on RDF >>query or RDF/XML (at that date 2001/2002) and said so when it was >>presented. Somewhat slipshod work showing insufficient care with >>basic XML or RDF. > >Yes, I agree that it lacks some of the secondary virtues that a good >editor could have caught. > >But isn't that like criticizing Bach for his penmanship? I think it would be more like criticizing him for his inability to play on-key. (So far as I know, that wasn't a problem for Bach, though there are interesting discussions about how notes have drifted over time.)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|