[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: InfoPath Digital Signature controversy?
At 14:59 29/10/2003, Chiusano Joseph wrote: ><Quote> >For accessibility, the presentational form has to vary to meet end user >need, yet here they mandate binding them. ></Quote> > >Are these two requirements (varying the presentational form to meet user >needs and binding presentation with content and context) orthogonal? I think so. orthogonal adj. [from mathematics] Mutually independent; well separated; sometimes, irrelevant to. If that's the implied meaning. E.g. I read braille. You read print,. Presentational form varies. (data identical, just needs a transform). If the 'final form' varies, then the supplier (US Gov) can't store just the single triple? It must store exceptions too, e.g. my braille presentational form, content and context. Does that make sense? regards DaveP
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|