[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Beyond Ontologies
>To determine if the web is a complex system, >read the draft of the W3C web architecture. >If the description there is clear to you, >it isn't. Complex systems are generally built up of simple components, I can't remember where I read this anecdote, it was probably from James Gleick's Chaos, early 90's I think, that a lot of physicists when they first saw the meteorological data thought "I can solve that" but it turned out that they couldn't. Think of it as being handed a Bayesian Network written in Java, obsessively object oriented, with spaghetti code all the way through. Looking at any segment of code might cause one to think, I can do better than this, but in the end it turns out the solution is to rewrite in LISP. (heh heh, just a joke) So given the traditional simple building blocks of true complexity http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/complexity/complexity.html You maybe should have said: If the description there isn't clear to you, it won't turn out to be a complex system. >If you consider a hypermedia link >a function call, then your vision is >coherent. A madman's vision is often coherent :) > Unfortunately, it is >too limited for the purpose of getting >a research grant. Darn. I was hoping to win an Ig Nobel. >For the cultural Rummy example, >what is coupled to the site where the term >originated that enabled it to propagate >quickly? Actually I was against Rummy as an example of complexity.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|