[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Binary XML == "spawn of the devil" ?
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 12:04:20PM -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote: >robin.berjon@e... (Robin Berjon) writes: >>> Thanks - that makes it clear. Seems like an odd omission. >> >>It is indeed. But there is no work that I know of going on around HTTP >>so I'm unsure how much can be done. > >I don't think this work needs to happen in HTTP specifically - it seems >like it could be broken out as a more general MIME-related issue. This >kind of encoding seems useful in contexts way beyond HTTP. Content-Encoding is not a MIME header. *sigh* HTTP's authors had the bad taste to use the MIME-reserved prefix "Content-" for headers in a protocol that is explicitly not MIME-compliant, and without defining the applicability of those MIME-like headers to other protocols (which admittedly would be difficult, since something like Content-Encoding isn't particularly compatible with 7bit transmission). Amy! -- Amelia A. Lewis amyzing {at} talsever.com To be whole is to be part; true voyage is return. -- Laia Asieo Odo (Ursula K. LeGuin, "The Dispossessed")
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|