[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: new URI dust-up
Yes, and it is such an old argument at this point, we can do it by the numbers. I thought it interesting that one editor believed the best thing to do with the problems of knowing if a resource or a representation is 'on the web' is to remove that phrase altogether. I doubt the mathIsLogic and the observerIsProofOfExistence camps will get together this season or ever. Both the world and the web keep on working though. len -----Original Message----- From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...] There's some good reading over at www-tag on the many "social" issues surrounding URIs. The context is RDF-specific, but seems appropriate to XML URI usage as well. Original message (TimBL): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jul/0022.html Contrasting reply (Pat Hayes): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jul/0147.html There's lots of potentially useful food for thought in there, though I'm still fond of this formulation: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jan/0301.html www-tag seems to be coming back to (cranky) life lately, albeit on familiar territory. If anyone thinks, for instance, that the W3C, Apache, and IETF get along magically, try: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2003Jul/0057.html
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|