[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Chameleon schemas <include>ing chameleon schemas
From: "Paul Spencer" <ps@b...> > ...Although I used to use chameleon schemas in very specific > instances because customers like to minimize the number of namespaces, > I now tend to namespace everything because otherwise I can guarantee > that at least one XML tool will screw up... Tough standard. It seems hard to find an XML Schema feature beyond DTDs that at least one tool doesn't screw up. Conversely, there seems to be no tool that doesn't screw up some feature. (I used to think XSV might be that tool, but awhile ago a union case in key/keyref proved its downfall. On that particular one, I believe MS, Xerces and XMLSpy were also wrong; the only correct answer came from MSV.) And that's just the implemented features... Bob Foster
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|