[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: About the number for productions in [XML 1.0SE]
Collin scripsit: > I find that the number for productions in [XML 1.0 SE] is not consecutive. > For example, there are production [32] and production [39]. However, productions [33]~[38] are missing. They were deleted by an erratum, as they were not actually referenced by any other production, and overlapped what RFC 1766/3066 (which is normatively referenced) said anyhow. > (Were they deleted for some reason?) > > Collin -- John Cowan jcowan@r... www.reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan I come from under the hill, and under the hills and over the hills my paths led. And through the air. I am he that walks unseen. I am the clue-finder, the web-cutter, the stinging fly. I was chosen for the lucky number. --Bilbo
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|