[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XML-based Automation (Was: Zen or Games?)
That's what I thought was the case. Yet, how far can one get reasoning over an imprecise source such as XML in the wild? Sure, it will be case by case, but XML does have containment, names, and attribution, and one can using document typing to cut down some of the wildness. This is something like embracing the position of those who say "XML should be agnostic to the receiver" combined with a system that says "sure, but the receiver then gets to pick interpretive rules and these may be analogical". len -----Original Message----- From: Danny Ayers [mailto:danny666@v...] > >So here is a fun puzzle for the cognoscenti. Can John Sowa's > >rules be applied to XML using XSLT or am I just taking too few > >or too many medications? ;-) > > > >http://www.jfsowa.com/pubs/analog.htm > > > >Or does this require RDF? > > Not claiming to be anywhere near coginscenti, but hey Len, > What the heck can RDF do that is even close to XSLT? Probably this particular example for a start. The Conceptual Graph model Sowa uses throughout his work isn't that far removed from the one underlying RDF. In fact Tim Berners-Lee [1] and others have considered mappings. I'm sure Analogical Reasoning could be done with XSLT, but you'd have to start by coming up with some way of representing the arbitrary graph structure of the entities and relationships first, over which you could apply the appropriate transformations. That would probably mean reinventing RDF. Cheers, Danny. [1] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/CG.html
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|