[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: Syntax + object model
Simon St.Laurent wrote: > jonathan@o... (Jonathan Borden) writes: > >What I am saying is that you are not making -- what I consider -- a > >fair or valid statement about ontologies *in general* as opposed to > >the above two projects. > > I disagree, but since you cut my discussion of specific ontologies, > there isn't much further to say. Hang out at knowledge tech conferences > and listen, and you'll find plenty of rhetorical overreach. I'll be the > jerk reading Feyerabend in the corner. Since I've not ever been to a KT conference, I'll take your word for it -- on the other hand similar rhetorical overreach was common in the heyday of XML conferences as well. In neither case does it mean that there isn't a core reality to both technologies. > > >For what I consider a significant class of problems, ontologies *are* > >the right answer for vocabulary development for XML. (e.g., see: > >http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/cgi-bin/webwn) > > Sure, for word searches, that's great. If I just want to mark up a > document or an invoice, I'm not nearly as excited about that vision. If the documents are components of a patient's healthcare record, I get pretty excited about that vision. Similarly folks like John Cowan might get excited about similarly marking up news stories related to heathcare. The National Library of Medicine has done a great job 'marking up' biomedical scientific articles using such a vision (i.e.: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed), now you may call that 'word search' but that is what google etc. are all about -- which alot of folks find pretty important -- of course I am not claiming (hardly) that ontologies encompass all of computer science, just to point out that there is a large and widely acknowledged as important class of problems that benefit from an ontologic approach. Since those problems also lend themselves to using XML as a document interchange format, the intersection between XML and ontologies is significant. > > >When you write about > >"ontologists" coming 'round xml-dev, I wonder who you are talking > >about? I don't consider myself an "ontologist" though I'm involved > >with ontologies -- I don't know of any real ontologists who post > >regularly on xml-dev, though perhaps there are a few who read it. > > I suspect 'real' ontologists have better things to do. Still, about > once a month, we get people here who talk about RDF as the right way to > do vocabularies. Roger Costello's recent piece on OWL was fairly > memorable, and it's been a popular trend lately. Are you suggesting that Roger's posts are offtopic? > Maybe it's just the > latest version of RDF condescension toward XML? > It is an all too common misconception that RDF is about ontologies. Admittedly there are relationships between RDF Schema and OWL, but the primary relationship between _RDF_ and OWL is that OWL is a language encoded in RDF _syntax_. You might gasp at that choice of syntax -- and it has been a somewhat controversial one as evidenced by discussions of the OWL WG -- but nonetheless RDF and hence RDF/XML is the official syntax in which the OWL language is interchanged. There are other presentation syntaxes for OWL including non-RDF XML (see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Dec/att-0295/01-OWL-XM L-Schemas.html) In any case I hardly detect any sort of "RDF condescension toward XML" in Roger's posts. I *have* heard XML condescension among discussions involving senior computer scientists who, for example, prefer s-expressions etc., but this is a really tough group -- what can one say? *** Jonathan *** I usually chide them that if the world really cared what they had to say, it would already be using Lisp :-))) **** **** I can say this (in jest) as a former Lisp hacker (so calm down)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|