[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Syntax + object model
Which standardized object model has been as successful as the standardized syntax of XML? Standardized data models on the other hand... ________________________________ From: Gustaf Liljegren [mailto:gustaf.liljegren@b...] Sent: Fri 5/23/2003 11:45 AM To: xml-dev@l... Subject: Syntax + object model Hi all, Maybe 5 years to late, but I never really understood the argument about why a standardized syntax is better than a standardized object model. It sounds right, but I can't explain why. Imagine XML like a standardized object model of various node types, with no rules whatsoever about the serialization format. Why would such a standard have less chance to survive? Also, imagine XML like a standardized object model PLUS a standardized syntax. Why would such a standard have less chance to survive? Gustaf ----------------------------------------------------------------- The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|