Cart
|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Reading specs between the lines( Was: Syntax + object model)
 As the Infoset says, infosets can be created in other ways than by John, I find that a slightly worrying approach to the interpretation of W3C specifications. Arguing from whitespace in a specification seems to me to be a pretty unreliable approach. Can one assume that an infoset can be a duck? :) .... I am not sure how an infoset looks, walks or talks (crucial criteria for Dare seemingly) .... but since the Infoset Rec doesn't have an exclusion clause to specify that it isn't a duck one can assume that it is? :) If the WG intended to say something significant about an/the infoset but failed to say it, then surely a short erratum would be in order? Andrew Watt 
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! 
Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||
