[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: What is XML's appropriate place in an office suite?
On Sat, 2003-04-19 at 04:51, AndrewWatt2000@a... wrote: > I see it more as a response to name-dropping rather than a refutation of an > argument. If there had been an argument put forward I could have responded > (or not) to it. > Andrew. A. That was not meant to be name dropping it was meant to be a reference to a set of arguments that I expected you to recognize. You claimed not to recognize them, then you make two puns that seem to imply that you are familiar with the relevant literature. B. You have substantive arguments on the table, from me and from others. If you choose not to answer them, I am strongly led to the conclusion that your <for discussion> tags are bogus. Am I wrong in expecting someone who puts out a controversial proposition 'for discussion' to defend it? IOW, are you playing games or are you seriously advancing your proposition? Frank
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|