[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1
Mike Champion wrote: > On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:56:01 -0700, Joe English <jenglish@f...> > wrote: > TimBL's right, of course, but: a) there's still no consensus on what > dereferencing a namespace URI should produce; What about RDDL? (or its new incarnation) > Speaking only for myself, and I will now shut up and crawl back under my > rock for another year or so until the permanentness of this permathread > gets under my skin once again :-) I KNOW that there are good arguments > against this rant, but it's just soooooooo frustrating to watch the W3C > "grind to a halt" over this that I just can't think about them anymore. I'm not under the impression that the W3C is grinding to a halt because of namespace resolution -- I find namespaces 1.1 remarkably clear on the fact thta string comparison must be used -- but rather that some people for some reason do not consider I18N and IRIs as important, which I find is a pity. -- Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...> Research Engineer, Expway http://expway.fr/ 7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|