[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Tree v. Table - A relational XML object model...?
[Elliotte Rusty Harold] > > Does it really? It seems to fit pretty nicely to me. For example, > > > <doc>This is <strong>very</strong> important.</doc> > You turn mixed content into non-mixed elements (temporarily, for the purposes of storage or table-modeling) by instantiating an implied _text_ element for each fragment of PCDATA. You use an illegal "element" name so that you can later distinguish between PCDATA pseudo-elements and real elements. The mixed example becomes, say, <doc><~text>This is</~text> <strong><~text>very</~text></strong> <~text>important.</~text></doc> It looks awful but its function is not to be read and written but to be crammed into a table model. Cheers, Tom P
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|