[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: many-to-many

• To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: many-to-many
• From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>
• Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 12:26:44 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <r01050400-1023-64F4098E30E511D78F1A0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.11]>

> From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...]
> Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 5:20 AM
> To: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  many-to-many
>
>
> tbray@t... (Tim Bray) writes:
> >Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> >
> >> "Cool URIs don't change" is a bad joke
> >
> >Really?  I can't agree.  The online publishers who are technically
> >competent, as well as the emerging community of webloggers, really do
> >have a culture of taking care of their URI space.  This is a Good Thing
> >and should be encouraged.   -Tim
>
> Encouraged, yes.
>
> Made axiomatic, no.
>
> The former lets us get work done easier.  The second wastes endless
> hours on madness for which "philosophical" is far too generous a title.

Well.

The aforementioned article is published as part of W3C "Style Guide for
online hypertext" [1], so this seems to be entirely advisory.

Julian


[1] <http://www.w3.org/Provider/Style/>

--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: many-to-many
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Re: many-to-many
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Is Resource/Representation a fruitful abstraction?
• Next by Date: Re: many-to-many
• Previous by thread: Re: many-to-many
• Next by thread: RE: many-to-many
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread