[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Is there a technical issue?
> Are you suggesting that technical discussion is beside the point? I think the complexity of the 2nd generation Recs is alarming most people. It's not just a datatype discussion, since namespaces evoke similar debates. Take namespaces. In SAX2, a new parameter was introduced, along with 2 interdependent configuration flags that affect those parameters. Of the four possible configuration settings, only three are valid. Plus, I keep needing to refer to a book or website to remember precisely what the effects of setting those flags are. One could say, "well, it's your job". Yeah, okay: I get to be SAX2 expert, along with Java expert, along with SQL expert, along with ORDBMS expert, along with XML expert, along with XML Schema expert, etc., etc., etc. Eventually, I cease to be expert at anything, because none of the tools I use are simple. Some of the problems I have are simple, but I can't seem to find simple tools anymore. Shoot, I even have this problem at home. My wife has a brakelight that can only be accessed by removing a cover attached by torx head screws. Well, I have one of those replaceable head screwdrivers. But no torx head. So I go to the store. I can buy two torx heads of different sized packaged together for $5. Or, for $6, I can by a ratchet multi-head screwdriver with swivel action. Well, of course I buy the latter. And, it has a torx (in addition to five others)! What a deal! So, I go home, replace the bulb. But I just spent $6, wasted time and gas, just because some dimbulb engineer decided a phillips head screw just wasn't the ticket. No, had to be torx. And now I have relatively a complex tool to handle standard screws in easily accessible places. And it's great, but eventually the rachet will break, the swivel won't swivel, and the kids will lose all those replaceable screw heads. But my old phillips will still work until the day I die. So what's the point? Hell, I don't know. But it was an entertaining story, though, wasn't it? > On the topic at hand, I thought the fundamental issue was the lack of > scenarios or clear examples that illustrate the point. That's > why I keep > pushing at that level. And I apologize if I was hijacking the thread. I'm differently attention-span enabled, in case you couldn't tell.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|