[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Common XML (was Re: Internal entities)
> > However, if there is another person "X" who > > uses tomorrow different syntax to express same meaning > > or same syntax to express different meaning, etc... > > (i.e. not being conservative) > > than the best think I can do is to ignore his/her information at all. > > > > This is actually a topic map authoring in a nut shell. :-)) > > Indeed, you can use RM4TM to "udermap" > > (is it a good neologism ?) any markup. > > Nikita, is it a typo for "undermap" or possibly "ubermap" ;-) Not sure I > see what you mean here. Can you give a use case? > > Thanks, Sam! Yep it was supposed to be "undermap". :-( However, it might be not that good idea after all, as I just discovered an unwanted connotation here. I meant "creating underlying map" not "insufficient mapping". --Nikita. Nikita Ogievetsky, nogievet@c...; Cogitech Inc. http://www.cogx.com Topic Maps Tutorials and Consulting. phone: 1 (917) 406 - 8734
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|