[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: more QName madness
Jonathan Borden scripsit: > > It would be really cool; it's probably well beyond the state of the > > art, unless the "description" were written in Java er sumpn. > > Hardly beyond the state of the art. I've suggested in > http://www.rddl.org/fragment-syntax that support for XPointer schemes might > be indicated in a RDDL document (one which might be dereferenced from the > XPointer scheme namespace for example) e.g. [snip] > Now it should be straightfoward to add pointers to various language > implementations of XPointer scheme dereferencing mechanisms via something > like: That was just my point: in order to *really* support interop of the kind D.V. wants, we need mobile code, not just "descriptions". -- Evolutionary psychology is the theory John Cowan that men are nothing but horn-dogs, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan and that women only want them for their money. http://www.reutershealth.com --Susan McCarthy (adapted) jcowan@r...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|