[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: more QName madness
jcowan@r... (John Cowan) writes: >Propose an alternative open system that doesn't involve creating a new >registry just for the purpose. I think I've already made it clear that between MIME Content Type registrations and the limited number of plausible generic schemes a new registry is unnecessary. In any event, perhaps it's time to drop the notion that the world must have an XML Fragment Identifier syntax by 31 December 2002. It's not clear at all that an "open" system is necessary, and constraining the development of "alternative systems" with that deadline seems artificial. Just let the XLink WG fade into history, leaving their public documents available, and pass for now on the vision of one true W3C-determined fragment identifier syntax for XML. The train has been off the tracks for years now, and seems to have dived into the ocean with the latest drafts. People definitely need a means of identifying fragments within XML documents. It is not at all clear that they should be looking to the W3C and its peculiar URI and QName biases for an answer. ------------- Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA http://simonstl.com may be my URI http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|