[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Character Entities: An XML Core WG View
> The question is, why should the privilege of being inconsistent (e.g. using > the same names for distinct characters) be allowed? OK since you assert that this is so easy, what would _you_ suggest to do about asymp. docbook (and the unicode ISO mappings) maps this entity to a cup-cap symbol. U224D (X)HTML maps it to a double tilde U2248 So MathML allows <mo>≈</mo> and this can be used in docbook+mathml and xhtml+mathml documents. If you change either of the docbook or xhtml dtd definitions to be consistent with the other then you risk -silently- changing thousands (millions?) of documents with no warning to the user than the character in the text and quite likely the meaning of the expression has changed. > I have yet to see a principled defense for supporting inconsistency here. I have yet to see a principled defence why the spelling of defence should change as you cross the atlantic. these things just happen if you have history rather than design on a clean slate. You can't, from your position in XML Core, just state "It shouldn't happen" and ignore the evidence that every single person who's attempted to define these mappings has ended up being inconsistent with everyone else. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|