[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
AndrewWatt2000@a... wrote: > In a message dated 20/11/2002 14:43:18 GMT Standard Time, > ann@w... writes: >> <wild_supposition type="breathless">You just have to wonder why anyone >> would bother continually responding to obvious flame >> bait</wild_supposition> > > Hi Ann, > > I will simply observe that your response totally lacks any logical > argument to support the supposition that XHTML 2.0 is a good idea or > that it is relevant in the changing world which will soon be upon us. The logic is quite simple: - AndrewWatt2000@a... can't refrain from posting ugly HTML to mailing lists - XHTML 2.0 is a big improvement on ugly HTML => XHTML 2.0 will make several lists less painful to follow -- Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...> Research Engineer, Expway 7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|