[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Why RDF is hard
jonathan@o... (Jonathan Borden) writes: >Sorry, I was refering to RDF itself, as opposed to RDF/XML. the much >maligned XML serialization syntax. So was I. The serialization syntax merely makes a bad situation worse. >Do you mean RDF/XML as a syntax is difficult, or what goes on after >the RDF/XML syntax is transformed into a set of triples being hard? I >fully agree that if the problem is that lack of a clearcut >relationship between syntax and triples, then by all means change the >RDF/XML syntax. Indeed many RDF folks have essentially abandonded >RDF/XML itself for N3/N-triples. N3 makes a bad situation clear. That clarity doesn't help those of us who don't think in triples and don't have the patience to string triples together into structures. For those who think in triples, RDF is a delight. I just wish those people would recognize that a lot of people cannot and will not be joining them in that delight. ------------- Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA http://simonstl.com may be my URI http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|