[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: more QName madness
> > >Sadly, my prediction that no-one would ever use XML > Namespaces because > > >the whole idea was so unworkable is one of many occasions > on which I > > I don't think I understand what the alternative is. Is it this? > Element names don't matter but it can have multiple xmlns:type > attributes that have URI(s) describing the element? Close, but it doesn't work for qualified attributes. Maybe its time to accept that XML is really just an inconvenient representation of an infoset.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|