[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: RDF for unstructured databases, RDF for axiomatic systems
>>No seriously, my biggest concern recently is that there seems to be an >>assumption that those who are interested in RDF are seeking to replace >>straight XML uses with RDF/XML. >> >You know what they say about making assumptions... >But when you see: > >1. RSS 1.0 - Take an existing widely deployed format and refactor it to >be RDF/XML. I haven't time for trolls this week. >2. This article: http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2002/10/30/rdf-friendly.html I can appreciate your point to some extent on this one, though there is still a huge difference in trying to make two systems more interoperable (friendly) and replce one with the other. >3. The attempted refactoring of RDDL to be RDF. I think the acronym expansions say more than I ever could: Resource Directory Description Language Resource Description Framework >It certainly does 'look' like those who are interested in RDF are >seeking to replace >straight XML uses with RDF/XML. Maybe so. But one of the reasons for that may be that many of the 'straight XML uses' can be done a lot better in RDF. Cheers, Danny.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|