[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: The truth about standards...


truth in standards
Oh, is Gosling saying standards were accepted (by other people)
before they are written? I took it to mean that he is claiming
that standards have been accepted (by standards bodies) before
they have been written. 

From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
 
> Take a look at the Draft Federal Standard for 
> XML Developers.  Note that it prefers W3C specs 
> over works from other organizations even if the 
> W3C specs are works in progress.   So in a policy 
> document, the sort of thing Gosling mentions is 
> indeed happening.

How do you get that?  In
http://xml.gov/documents/in_progress/developersguide.pdf

it merely says that full standards must be used, and where there
is competition, favour a W3C Recommendation.  If there is a
W3C Proposed Recommendation, you may decide to favour
that if you commit to upgrading when the Rec comes out.

"Ensure" is a funny word to use, and may have some American public 
service meaning, I suppose, but on the face of it, if there is no WXS REC 
in sight, you should fallback to another standard, and if there are 
no standards, you are then (naturally) in the province of proprietary or 
custom applications.  They need to clarify.

It also specifically mentions and allows ISO, ebXML and OASIS standards.
Indeed, if there is an ISO or OASIS standard and a proprietary 
technology, people must choose the standard.
 
Then it goes on to say "use XML Schemas" (unless you are continuing
with SGML-ish DTD projects).  This specifically shuts the door
on using DTDs and RELAX NG for being the published structure definition
languages for public schemas.  

It seems that Schematron (assuming it is accepted as an ISO standard) 
would fit in OK if used to augment a primary WXS schema. The mention
of annotations suggests that embedded Schematron is OK too.  In particular,
it would not be a "proprietary extension" and could not be used to "define
structures": instead it is providing (executable) documentation on things like 
links to external vocabularies and co-occurrence constraints, which are
out-of-scope for WXS. 

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.