[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Alternate (non-RDF) XML syntax for OWL
Jonathan Borden wrote: Indeed there might be any number of alternate XML syntaxes for RDF any of which are 'better' than RDF/XML e.g. Tim's > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2002Nov/0044.html Like I said elsewhere, there's a few knocking about. Getting the W3 to adopt one would make the difference. RDF Core has been very careful to stay within its charter on the matter of XML syntax - the scope for real improvement has generally been on the semantic side of the house. On the other hand RDF Core saw fit to invent an entirely new syntax to describe test cases. Bill de hÓra -- Propylon www.propylon.com
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|