[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: xml schema

• To: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: xml schema
• From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 11:22:35 -0400
• In-reply-to: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E07A971D2@r...>
• References: <8BD7226E07DDFF49AF5EF4030ACE0B7E07A971D2@r...>

At 7:34 AM -0700 9/2/02, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
>Many statements in his article indicate his bias[0]. What more do 
>you want, a point by point rebuttal in a counter-article on XML.com?

I want specific evidence that the author of this article is biased. 
Note that this is quite different than evidence that the author of 
the article is wrong. You can be completely unbiased and still wrong. 
Absent such evidence, I find the claim of bias to be mere calumny 
designed to avoid a real refutation.
-- 

+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
| Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@m... | Writer/Programmer |
+-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+
|          XML in a  Nutshell, 2nd Edition (O'Reilly, 2002)          |
|              http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian2/              |
|  http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0596002920/cafeaulaitA/  |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
|  Read Cafe au Lait for Java News:  http://www.cafeaulait.org/      |
|  Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.cafeconleche.org/    |
+----------------------------------+---------------------------------+

• References:
  • RE: xml schema
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: xml schema
• Next by Date: RE: .NET schema validator issue
• Previous by thread: Re: RE: xml schema
• Next by thread: RE: xml schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread