[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration languages


Re:  [Fwd: The problems with Xlink for integration    languages

Hi Ann,

Ann Navarro wrote:

> Why use any agreed upon XML vocabulary? Why not just use raw XML all 
> the time?


By far the best post of this thread.

Currently, (X)HTML is mostly used for presentational purposes alone. I 
would agree that in 90% of cases, XML+XLink+CSS2+ECMAScript should be 
used to do what (X)HTML does today.

Mozilla can be thought of as a platform based on this approach. It goes 
even further, as XBL covers the rest 10% of use cases...

Kindest regards,

Manos


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.