[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: linking, 80/20
John Cowan wrote: > > Simon St.Laurent scripsit: > > > Allowing href on everything - whether or not it has the unnecessary > > xlink: namespace slapped on it - is a much larger advance in making > > hypertext broadly useful than any attempt to rewrite XHTML to take > > advantage of complex links. > > I agree, actually. But it wouldn't cost them anything to use > xlink:href (and a #FIXED attribute of xlink:type="simple") and it > would make generalized link harvesters that much more useful. I disagree. There is a cognitive load imposed by requiring authors to remember what namespaces various features of their markup language come from. RDF for metadata. DC for a particular ontology. XLink for linking. XForms for forms. HTML's original virtue was how easy it was to learn and remember. -- "When I walk on the floor for the final execution, I'll wear a denim suit. I'll walk in there like Willie Nelson, John Wayne, Will Smith -- Men in Black -- James Brown. Maybe do a Michael Jackson moonwalk." Congressman James Traficant.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|