[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

XHTML Modularization in RNG (was: Best Practice - Vanilla XML?)

• To: elharo@m... (Elliotte Rusty Harold)
• Subject: XHTML Modularization in RNG (was: Best Practice - Vanilla XML?)
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 10:19:28 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: jeffrafter@d... (Jeff Rafter), xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <p04330100b98a7fd96bad@[192.168.254.4]> from "Elliotte Rusty Harold" at Aug 22, 2002 07:48:52 AM

Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit:

> Sure you can. This is exactly what modular XHTML is designed for. The 
> specs give detailed instructions for how to mix your own vocabularies 
> into XHTML by setting the appropriate parameter entity references in 
> a driver DTD.

Furthermore, at http://thaiopensource.com/relaxng/xhtml there is available
a RELAX NG version of XHTML modularization; not a conversion of the DTD,
but a rebuilt version designed for convenient RNG use.

You can mix in your own attributes and elements very easily using the
combine-by-interleaving feature of RNG.  For example, to add an element
named "rdf:RDF" to the model of "xhtml:head", you just write:

<define name="head.content" combine="interleave">
  <element ns="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" name="RDF">
    <ref name="rdf.model"/>
  </element>
</define>

Or in the compact syntax:

head.content &= element rdf:RDF { rdf.model }

-- 
Knowledge studies others / Wisdom is self-known;      John Cowan
Muscle masters brothers / Self-mastery is bone;       jcowan@r...
Content need never borrow / Ambition wanders blind;   www.ccil.org/~cowan
Vitality cleaves to the marrow / Leaving death behind.    --Tao 33 (Bynner)

• References:
  • Re: Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-stepapproach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM)
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented nature of DOM
• Next by Date: Re: A multi-step approach on defining object-oriented n
• Previous by thread: Re: Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-stepapproach on defining object-orientednatureof DOM)
• Next by thread: Re: Best Practice = Vanilla XML? (was A multi-step approachon defining object-orientednatureof DOM)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread