[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Gah

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Gah
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:30:52 -0400
• In-reply-to: <r01050300-1015-CB3D4C3BB08411D683CE0003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>

I wrote:
> (Apologies
> for the plug, but it's one of the few books I've edited which has made
> me fonder of the technologies it covered instead of merely
> frustrated.)</plug>

That looks really odd, so I should clarify before my authors beat me up.  

This book got me over my initial gag reaction to a subject which at
first glance looked horrible but which turned out largely nice once I
got up the steep curve at the start.  

I'm quite pleased with the other books I've edited, but have to admit
that I still marvel at how hard it can be to nail down what a spec
really means. That generates real frustration, even when the authors are
fantastic.  And some books covered subjects I knew from the outset would
be enjoyable... I do like some things!

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• References:
  • Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Can XLink be fixed?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread