[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: How to get realistic expectations for Namespaces (was Best
Rick Jelliffe scripsit: > For example, apart from the xml: and xmlns: built-in namespaces, has there > even been any QNamed attributes that have succeeded? Or any > QNamed inline elements (not having an ancestor in the same namespace)? It's not the case that XML vocabularies "succeed" if and only if they have a huge public practice. Reuters Health articles embed an rdf:Description element into html:head, and this "succeeds" in the sense that our customers successfully figure out what to do with it. We supply a DTD (and any other schema type on demand, but no demand yet) specifying how to mix the subset of XHTML with the subset of RDF that we use. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan <jcowan@r...> You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn. You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn. Clear all so! `Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|