[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Re: URIs, concrete

• To: <uche.ogbuji@f...>, "'John Cowan'" <jcowan@r...>
• Subject: RE: Re: URIs, concrete
• From: Bill de hÓra <bill.dehora@p...>
• Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 16:24:31 +0100
• Cc: "'Simon St.Laurent'" <simonstl@s...>, <jborden@a...>, <xml-dev@l...>
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <E17aHbi-0004GR-00@m...>
• Organization: Propylon
• Reply-to: <bill.dehora@p...>

> From: uche.ogbuji@f... 
>
> It's not to late to fix RDF in this area.  It is still WD.  

You crticise this decision in RDFXML with allusions to the "Right Thing"
and the "spirit of XML". Can you say what is wrong with this approach,
or is it just a matter of taste?

> I hope others moving to RDF from the XML 
> perspective back me up and help get this 
> sorted out.  

I came to RDF from XML. But from your past posts I don't understand why
I'd back you up here. Why would I do that Uche? I'm not baiting, I just
don't see the reason. If anything needs to be fixed here it seems to be
XMLNS.

regards,
Bill de hÓra
..
Propylon
www.propylon.com 

 

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• References:
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: HTML and XML data parsing
• Next by Date: RE: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete
• Next by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread