[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: W3C XFrames - first public WD published
At 12:03 PM 8/8/2002 +0200, bryan wrote: >For development purposes there is another side to that which I don't >think is matched, that is to say using XHTML 1.0 that's invalid should >product glaring problems of a similar nature in major browsers of more >recent versions, the same for CSS 1. That's a vendor issue -- if despite languages that require validity for conformance, the vendor continues to produce products that do "what we think they intended to write" instead of "do what they actually wrote" -- then I suppose the debug process could arguably be harder -- if you debug by validation and not sight, that should eliminate most of it. Ann
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|