[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
> removed non-XSLT-namespace _attributes_ it wouldn't be much use, but > that whole business works because XSLT processors are more-or-less > required to use Simon's best-practice recommendation, and take > unprefixed attributes in XSLT elements to be also in that namespace. But only if you use your own private definition of what it means to be in a namespace. XSLT processors can not assume that the version attribute in <xsl:stylesheet version=... is in the XSLT namespace because if the attribute was in the XSLT namespaec it would be equivalent to <xsl:stylesheet xsl:version=... and that's an error. > Badly expressed -- I only meant that the concept `global attribute' > doesn't seem at all valuable, and appears to only confuse things. The concept of "global attribute" as defined by the namespace spec is the same as the concept of "attribute in a namespace". Whether or not it is useful depends on your view of how useful namespaces are. David _____________________________________________________________________ This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|