[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Comparable considered necessary

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Comparable considered necessary
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:02:30 -0400
• In-reply-to: <3D57DAE3.96043000@p...>

Paul Prescod writes:
> There are actually relatively few widely deployed URI schemes. Every
> day there is a proposal for a new one but the HTTP transport truck
> just keeps rolling over them. Some will see this as a bad thing but I
> see it as the key thing that keeps the Web unified.

It keeps complete URI madness in check, yes.  Unfortunately, it hasn't
helped us much on namespace issues.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• References:
  • Re: Comparable considered necessary
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XLink olden days
• Next by Date: RE: Comparable considered necessary
• Previous by thread: Re: Comparable considered necessary
• Next by thread: Re: Comparable considered necessary
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread