[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
Hi Simon Simon said: In my case, the split is between my two primary communities, so what may seem like ancient history to you is critically important to me. Fixing this is going to be damn hard, but papering over a process failure doesn't seem like a good start. Didier replies: I agree with you Simon. Having XHTML not using xlink (based on sound reasons) indicates a schism in the XML framework. If within W3C, the different facet of the consortium produced XML specifications are not used, how can we expect that it will be the case among the developers. You know the joke about a camel being a horse designed by a comity. In that case, the camel even rejected one of its paws :-) When we observe the computer industry we can notice that when things are not made upward compatible, there is a breakdown in a the marketplace. I guess that this is a signal to the market not to move to XHTML but stick with the actual SGML based language (i.e. HTML). Hummm, will the web eventually move to XML? I doubt since the probability is quite high that we'll have this kind of situation to occur more and more often. The camel will need several prostheses :-) Cheers Didier PH Martin
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|