[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: [xm

• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
• From: "Jelks Cabaniss" <jelks@j...>
• Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 22:15:58 -0400
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <r01050300-1015-358259EEB43E11D69F470003937A08C2@[192.168.124.21]>

Simon St.Laurent wrote:

> But hey, we all know why the namespaces spec exists: to 
> create pointless arguments!  

They're not pointless; XML-DEV sometimes serves as an excellent support
group...

	"Hi.  My name is Fred, and I'm a namespace user."

	"Hi, Fred!"

	<time-passes/>

	Fred was found dead this morning in a hotel room,
	apparently as the result of an overdose of colons. 
	Police discovered URIs and other assorted paraphenalia 
	strewn around the room.  Relapses are more common
	today than in previous years, possibly because the
	bumper crop of colons from Afghanistan are of the
	extremely potent variety.


/Jelks

	

• References:
  • Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: namespace reprise
• Next by Date: RE: A multi-step approach on defining object-orientednature of DOM
• Previous by thread: Re: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was:Re: linking, 80/20]
• Next by thread: RE: the infoset is two infosets (or even three?) [was: Re: linking, 80/20]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread