[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Re: XHTML 2.0 and the death of XLink and XPointer?
Masayasu Ishikawa scripsit: > No. We are waiting XPointer to advance to more mature stage, and > relevant media type registrations get updated. Adopting XLink and XPointer involves providing a conformance clause for the use of XPointer: which of the four XPointer documents do you make mandatory. It's possible to shuffle this off onto XMLMIME, but then you limit XHTML to whatever is appropriate for general XML. IMHO XHTML 2.0 should define its own level of XPointer conformance. -- John Cowan jcowan@r... http://www.reutershealth.com "Mr. Lane, if you ever wish anything that I can do all you will have to do will be to send me a telegram asking and it will be done." "Mr. Hearst, if you ever get a telegram from me asking you to do anything you can put the telegram down as a forgery."
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|