[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 23:18:04 -0400
• In-reply-to: <004601c239d1$4a72a290$fe193044@tbp1>
• References: <B96EEABE.D863%hutch@x...><4.2.0.58.20020801225133.01329ea0@p...>

At 11:04 PM 8/1/2002 -0400, Thomas B. Passin wrote:
>  I could have been reasonably happy either way, but what does not work for
>me is this mix-and-match situation where some systems do it one way and
>others do it another way.

That's the price of trying to fix a system four years too late, I'm afraid.

I merely hope that my "best practice" solution will at least dissuade some 
people from creating documents that are especially hard to deal with 
whether we fix the problem or not.

Simon St.Laurent
"Every day in every way I'm getting better and better." - Emile Coue

• References:
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask thequestion)
    • From: Bob Hutchison <hutch@x...>
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Global/Local attributes
• Next by Date: RE: Global/Local attributes
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the
• Next by thread: Re: Re: URIs, concrete (was Re: Un-ask the question)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread