[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: ANN: Building Web Services the REST Way
Rich Salz wrote: > > > Rich says: "I'm legally disallowed > > from having my Web gateway understand the semantics of the information > > it is dealing with." > > I never said there HAD to be a web gateway. I'd just like to be able to > send it operations where parts of the data are encrypted. REST doesn't > seem to be able to handle that. Let's step back. What are you looking for with REST? If we're doing a bullet point feature comparison with SOAP or something and you want to say that REST doesn't support something then I'll go with Mark Baker and suggest you use the "tunnel" feature (which I would say, is from a REST point of view mostly useless). If you want the advantages of REST *above and beyond* those offered by SOAP then I would suggest you use SSL rather than tunnel. When people ask if REST can do X or Y I presume they mean whether REST's unique advantages are compatible with X or Y. I think that the answer with respect to tunnelling is "no". The more information you reveal to your HTTP server (whether standalone, embedded, inside the firewall or in the DMZ) and CGI/Servlet, the more it can help you (just like an XSLT engine, or XML Schema validator, or whatever else). But if we're going to drill deeper maybe we should move it to rest-discuss. I thought that my first answer was straightforward but we're still discussing it so I guess not. -- Come discuss XML and REST web services at: Open Source Conference: July 22-26, 2002, conferences.oreillynet.com Extreme Markup: Aug 4-9, 2002, www.extrememarkup.com/extreme/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|