[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Slightly off, but... was: XUL appears to be dead, istheres
Elliotte wrote: >Actually Mozilla would let you do this using XLinks rather than HTML >links. In fact, you could make your html:a element an XLink too so it >works in both IE6 and Mozilla. Something like: ><item xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> > <title>...</title> > <description>...</description> > <link>http://...</link> > <html:a href="http://..." xlink:href="http://...">...</html:a> > <dc:date>2002-07-09T10:19:17-01:00</dc:date> ></item> I was just wondering since I don't do as much with Mozilla as I should, but if I remember correctly it's xlink implementation was all simple xlinks and didn't give any benefits beyond the basic html a link. Is that incorrect? If so can someone give me a succinct description of the xlink benefits Mozilla has above simple linking?
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|