[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: JMS OR SOAP

• To: lakshmi@c...
• Subject: Re: JMS OR SOAP
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 23:59:14 -0700
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0206071340330.22549-100000@gecko>

lakshmi@c... wrote:
> 
> We are using the DOM as a repository for the state of the switch and in
> order
> to share the state, we need to share the dom.
> We could possibly access it from a common file but the only problem with
> accessing from a common
> file is that the file is not going to be static, and at some point there
> will be multiple editors of the file
> so if there is a common file or common location it would have to manage
> updates from all editors
> and also manage passing changes to the multiple listeners, though maybe
> that would make sense to do?
> we could have a common data repository / we could have a central
> repository for the DOM
> that can be attached to JMS MQseries or other JMS queue implementation...

One solution is to use a native XML database that lets multiple users
share DOM trees over the same document. For example, I believe Infonyte
DB does this. For a list of native XML databases, see:

   http://www.rpbourret.com/xml/ProdsNative.htm

-- Ron

• References:
  • JMS OR SOAP
    • From: <lakshmi@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: W3C Schema: Resistance is Futile, says Don Box
• Next by Date: Malicious documents? (WAS: Interesting mailing list & a rare broadside)
• Previous by thread: JMS OR SOAP
• Next by thread: Re: Can RDDL and RDF coexist?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread